DOI: 10.24411/2470-1262-2020-10079
Abstract: Modern studies of bilingualism tend to focus on the neurophysiological processes related to changes in the structure and peculiarities in the functioning of the brains of bilingual people.
Particular interest is shown towards studies related to the formation of the brain structures in young children who are raised in multilingual environments. Bilinguals display their advantages most clearly in early childhood when they can be more disciplined, much better at communicating, and more empathetic than their peers. Researchers have proven that communication with native speakers is the decisive factor which enables the successful acquisition of a foreign language. Such early experiences of bilingual communication form a special language zone in children’s brains, which makes it much easier to learn foreign languages later on in life. Monitoring of adult bilinguals reveals that they tend to be adapted much better to their social and professional lives.
Artificial bilingualism at a later age can reveal personal traits that are related to the acquisition of a particular foreign language. Senior bilinguals have more flexible mental processes, better memory and concentration ability as well as slowed dementia onset.
Keywords: bilingualism, polylingualism, cognitive development, personal qualities, natural
early bilingualism, late artificial bilingualism
References:
1. Bekasova, E., Markemann, A. The Phenomenon of Adult Bilingualism in Multicultural
Society//Materials of the 7th International Scientific and Research Seminar on Social and Cultural Adaptation of Russian-language Immigrants “Russian Language in the Family” and other academic events of the Russian Language, Russian Education, and Russian Culture Week in Finland. – M.: RosNOU Publishing House, 2012, pages 31–35.2. Bekasova, E. Personal Qualities of Students during the Formation of Professional Bilingualism: dissertation paper, Candidate of Psychological Sciences, 19.00.01 //Bekasova Ekaterina Yurievna – M., 2017, 205 pages.
3. Popova, M. V. Psychological Traits of Bilinguals: a Russian-speaking
European/M. V. Popova//Russian Language Abroad No. 6, 2014, pages 67–69.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology. 49A.
5. Bartzokis, G., Sultzer, D., Lu, Po H., Nuechterlein, Κ. H., Mintz, J., & Cummings, J. L. (2004).
“Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: Implications for cortical “disconnection” in aging and Alzheimer’s disease.” Neurobiology of Aging, 25, 8.
6. Bialystock, E. Words as Things: Development of Word Concept by Bilingual Children / Е.
Bialystock // Studies in Second Language Learning, 1987. – 9. – P. 133–140.
7. Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (2010). Structure and process in lifespan cognitive development.
In: The Handbook of Life-Span Development: Biology, Cognition and Methods across the Life-Span. R. M. Lerner & W. F. Overton (Eds), Hoboken, N. J: Wiley, pp. 195.
8. Costa, ., Hernandez, M., & Sebastiân-Galles, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution:
Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition. 106, 59–86.
9. Cummins, J. The influence of bilingualism on cognitive growth: A synthesis of research findings and explanatory / J. Cummins // Working Papers on Bilingualism, 1976. – V.9. – P. 19.
10. Farhadian, M., Abdullah, R., Mansor, M., Redzuan, M., Gazanizadand, N., & Kumar, V. (2010).
“Theory of mind in bilingual and monolingual preschool children.” Journal of Psychology. 1, 39–
46.
11. Fuster, J. M. (2008). The Prefrontal Cortex (Fourth Edition) London, UK: Academic Press.
Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, V. S. (2009). “Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of
voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 35, 640–665.
12. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M. & Liu, H.-M. 2003. “Foreign-Language Experience in Infancy: Effects
of Short-Term Exposure and Social Interaction on Phonetic Learning.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (15): 9096–101.
13. Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S. & Iverson, P. 2006. “Infants Show
a Facilitation Effect for Native Language Phonetic Perception Between 6 and 12 Months.”
Developmental Science 9 (2): F13–F21.
14. Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera Gaxiola, M. & Nelson, T.
(2008). “Phonetic Learning as a Pathway to Language: New Data and Native Language Magnet
Theory Expanded (NLM-e).” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 363
(1493): 979–1000.
15. Luk, G., Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Grady, C. L. (2011). “Lifelong bilingualism maintains
white matter integrity in older adults.” Journal of Neuroscience. 31, 16808–16813.
16. Ramírez, F. N., Ramírez, R.R., Clarke, M., Taulu, S. & Kuhl, P. K. 2017а. “Speech Discrimination in 11-Month-Old Bilingual and Monolingual Infants: A Magnetoencephalography Study.” Developmental Science 20 (1). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.12427/
17. Ramirez, F. N., Kuhl P. The Brain Science of Bilingualism Naja Ferjan Source: YC Young
Children, Vol. 72, No. 2 (May 2017b), pp. 38–44.
Information about the author:
Ekaterina Yu. Bekasova (Moscow, Russia) – PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Moscow
State Pedagogical University, Russia. (6 Maly Sukharevsky lane, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation). Published scientific works — more than 20 (pedagogical psychology, general psychology, psychology of bilingualism).
E-mail: bekasova1706@gmail.com
For citation: Bekasova Ekaterina Yu., (2020).
Neurophysiological Investigation into Bilinguals’ Mental Advantages.
Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science
Vol.5, Issue 4 (2020), pp. 86-92 (in USA)