Modern studies of bilingualism tend to focus on the neurophysiological processes related to
changes in the structure and peculiarities in the functioning of the brains of bilingual people.
Particular interest is shown towards studies related to the formation of the brain structures in young
children who are raised in multilingual environments. Bilinguals display their advantages most
clearly in early childhood when they can be more disciplined, much better at communicating, and
more empathetic than their peers. Researchers have proven that communication with native
speakers is the decisive factor which enables the successful acquisition of a foreign language. Such
early experiences of bilingual communication form a special language zone in children’s brains,
which makes it much easier to learn foreign languages later on in life. Monitoring of adult
bilinguals reveals that they tend to be adapted much better to their social and professional lives.
Artificial bilingualism at a later age can reveal personal traits that are related to the acquisition of
a particular foreign language. Senior bilinguals have more flexible mental processes, better
memory and concentration ability as well as slowed dementia onset.
Keywords: bilingualism, polylingualism, cognitive development, personal qualities, natural
early bilingualism, late artificial bilingualism
1. Bekasova, E., Markemann, A. The Phenomenon of Adult Bilingualism in Multicultural
Society//Materials of the 7th International Scientific and Research Seminar on Social and Cultural
Adaptation of Russian-language Immigrants “Russian Language in the Family” and other academic
events of the Russian Language, Russian Education, and Russian Culture Week in Finland. – M.:
RosNOU Publishing House, 2012, pages 31–35.
2. Bekasova, E. Personal Qualities of Students during the Formation of Professional
Bilingualism: dissertation paper, Candidate of Psychological Sciences, 19.00.01
//Bekasova Ekaterina Yurievna – M., 2017, 205 pages.
3. Popova, M. V. Psychological Traits of Bilinguals: a Russian-speaking
European/M. V. Popova//Russian Language Abroad No. 6, 2014, pages 67–69.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology. 49A.
5. Bartzokis, G., Sultzer, D., Lu, Po H., Nuechterlein, Κ. H., Mintz, J., & Cummings, J. L.
(2004). “Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity:
Implications for cortical “disconnection” in aging and Alzheimer’s disease.” Neurobiology
of Aging, 25, 8. 6. Bialystock, E. Words as Things: Development of Word Concept by Bilingual Children / Е.
Bialystock // Studies in Second Language Learning, 1987. – 9. – P. 133–140.
7. Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (2010). Structure and process in lifespan cognitive
development. In: The Handbook of Life-Span Development: Biology, Cognition and
Methods across the Life-Span. R. M. Lerner & W. F. Overton (Eds), Hoboken, N. J: Wiley,
8. Costa, ., Hernandez, M., & Sebastiân-Galles, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict
resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition. 106, 59–86.
9. Cummins, J. The influence of bilingualism on cognitive growth: A synthesis of research
findings and explanatory / J. Cummins // Working Papers on Bilingualism, 1976. – V.9. –
10. Farhadian, M., Abdullah, R., Mansor, M., Redzuan, M., Gazanizadand, N., & Kumar, V.
(2010). “Theory of mind in bilingual and monolingual preschool children.” Journal of
Psychology. 1, 39–46. 11. Fuster, J. M. (2008). The Prefrontal Cortex (Fourth Edition) London, UK: Academic
Press. Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, V. S. (2009). “Should I stay or should I switch? A costbenefit
analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals”. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 35, 640–665.
12. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M. & Liu, H.-M. 2003. “Foreign-Language Experience in Infancy:
Effects of Short-Term Exposure and Social Interaction on Phonetic Learning.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (15): 9096–101.
13. Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S. & Iverson, P. 2006.”Infants Show a Facilitation Effect for Native Language Phonetic Perception Between 6
and 12 Months.” Developmental Science 9 (2): F13–F21. 14. Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera Gaxiola, M. & Nelson,
T. (2008). “Phonetic Learning as a Pathway to Language: New Data and Native Language
Magnet Theory Expanded (NLM-e).” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
London B, 363 (1493): 979–1000.
15. Luk, G., Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Grady, C. L. (2011). “Lifelong bilingualism
maintains white matter integrity in older adults.” Journal of Neuroscience. 31, 16808–
16. Ramírez, F. N., Ramírez, R.R., Clarke, M., Taulu, S. & Kuhl, P. K. 2017а. “Speech
Discrimination in 11-Month-Old Bilingual and Monolingual Infants: A
Magnetoencephalography Study.” Developmental Science 20 (1).
17. Ramirez, F. N., Kuhl P. The Brain Science of Bilingualism Naja Ferjan Source: YC
Young Children, Vol. 72, No. 2 (May 2017b), pp. 38–44.
Information about the author:
Ekaterina Yu. Bekasova (Moscow, Russia) – PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor,
Moscow State Pedagogical University, Russia. (6 Maly Sukharevsky lane, Moscow, 127051,
Russian Federation), E-mail: email@example.com Published scientific works — more
than 20 (pedagogical psychology, general psychology, psychology of bilingualism).
Acknowledgements: The author is grateful to the Russian scientific electronic library
elibrary.ru for the possibility of the necessary information search.
For citation: Bekasova Ekaterina Yu., (2020). Neurophysiological Investigation into Bilinguals’ Mental Advantages. Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science. Vol.5, Issue 4 (2020), pp. 86-92 (in USA)
Manuscript received 27/02/2020
Accepted for publication: 17/03/2020
The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
CC BY 4.0