DOI: 10.24412/2470-1262-2024-1-18-27


Abstract:The paper deals with the connection between the ways of modelling the author’s consciousness, the signs of the author’s position in a fiction work with the author’s, cultural and national identity. The task is carried out on the material of Pushkin’s poetics. The methodology of the article is based on the methods of using the ideas of theoretical, historical, communicative poetics and their role in developing didactic foundations for the study of the author’s position and identity. The application of the concepts characterizing the principles of creating a worldview, impact on the reader, and innovation of the writer is justified. The appeal to M. Bakhtin’s ideas is justified from the standpoint of communicative poetics and is concerned with such issues as the author and the hero, the concept of dialogism, and the types of heroisation. This approach became the basis for the techniques of analyzing the author’s position in a fiction work. The transposition of the ideas of receptive aesthetics into the field of hermeneutics and phenomenology makes it possible to realize a transdisciplinary approach based also on the concepts of cultural anthropology. The use of hermeneutic, phenomenological methods, axiological and non-rhetorical (discourse) approaches is conditioned by the achievement of a holistic approach to the problem. The obtained results contribute to the development of the new approaches to the formation of the Russian idea as a category of national consciousness. The constants of Russian national consciousness are presented as an important feature of Pushkin’s ontology and the cause of the identity crisis he depicts. The role of extra-textual cultural relations as a source of artistic anthropology is revealed. Cultural and national identity is considered in the aspect of reception.

Keywords: ontology, Pushkin, authors’ consciousness, author’s identity, cultural and national identity



  1. Osovsky O.E., Kirzhaeva V.P. O dvukh terminakh M.M. Bakhtina v kontexte istorii otechestvennogo literaturovedeniia ХХ v. [About two terms of M.M. Bakhtin in the context of the history of Russian literary studies of the twentieth century] // Philology and Culture. – 2016. – №1(43). – P. 223-228.
  2. Tamarchenko N.D. Poetika Bakhtina i sovremennaya retseptsiya ego tvorchestva (Filologiia v litsakh) [Bakhtin’s Poetics and Modern Reception of His Work (Philology in Faces)] // Voprosy Literatury. – 2011 – №1. – P. 291-340.
  3. Poetika: slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i poniatiy [Poetics: a dictionary of topical terms and concepts] / ed. by N.D. Tamarchenko.Moscow: Kulagina Publishing House, Intrada, 2008. – 358 p.
  4. Izer V. Izmeneniye funktsiy literatuty [Changing functions of literature] //Modern literary theory: an anthology / compiled, translated and annotated by I. V. Kabanova. – Moscow: Flinta, Nauka, 2004. – P. 22-45.
  5. Esaulov I.A. O sokrovennom smysle “Stantsionnogo smotritelia” A.S. Pushkina [On the hidden meaning of “Station Keeper” by A.S. Pushkin] // The Gospel text in Russian literature of the XVIII-XX centuries: quotation, reminiscence, motif, plot, genre: a collection of scientific articles – Petrozavodsk: Petrovodsk State University, 2012. – P. 25-30.
  6. Esaulov I.A. Kategoriia sobornosti v russkoy literature [The Category of Collectivity in Russian Literature] – Petrozavodsk: PSU, 1995. – 288 p.
  7. Esaulov I.A. Paskhalnost’ v russkoy slovesnosti [Easter in Russian literature] – Moscow: Krug, 2004. – 560 p.
  8. Esaulov I.A. Spektr adekvatnosti v istolkovanii literaturnogo proizvedeniya: “Mirgorod” N.V.Gogolya [Spectrum of adequacy in the interpretation of a literary work: “Mirgorod” by N.V. Gogol] – M.: RGGU, 1997. – 100 p.
  9. Tyupa V.I. Diskursnyy analiz [Discourse analysis]// Tyupa I.V. Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta. – M.: Akademiya, 2008. – Р .273-299.
  10. Goller B.A. “Gore ot uma” v sovremennom mire [“Woe from Wit” in the Modern World] // Voprosy Literatury. – 2009. – № 4. [Electronyy resurs]. URL: Date of application: 02.02.2024
  11. Pushkin A.S. “Byla pora nash prazdnik molodoy…” [“There was a time: our young holiday…”] // Pushkin A.S. CompleteWorks: In 16 vol. -M.: L.: Izd-voor AS USSR, 1937-1959. Т.3. Book1.Poems, 1826-1836. Fairy tales. – 1948. – P. 431-433. [Electronyy resurs]. URL: Date of application: 25.02.2024
  12. A.S.Pushkin kak fenomen russkoy literatury: uchebnoye posobiye [A.S. Pushkin as a phenomenon of Russian literature: textbook] / V.S. Lobareva, T.A. Bakhor, O.N. Zyryanova, N.A.Mazurova, L.S. Shmulskaya. – Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University, 2017. – 140 p.
  13. K.Urazayeva, G.Yerik. Skazka o Tsare Saltane A. Pushkina. Paradox I metod raboty pisatelia s russkoy narodnoy skazkoy [The Tale of Tsar Saltan by A. Pushkin] The paradox and method of the writer’s work with the Russian folk tale // Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Series “Philology”. № 1(105). – 2022. – P. 137-146. DOI 10.31489/2022Ph1/137-146. ISSN 2518-198X (Print) ISSN 2663-5127 (Online).
  14. Akimov E.B. “Grobovtschik A.S.Pushkina I “Gamlet” Shekspira [“The Coffin Maker” by A.S. Pushkin and “Hamlet” by Shakespeare] // Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye. 2009. – №1. – P. 107-113
  15. Bocharov S. Suzhety russkoy literatury [Plots of Russian Literature] – M.: Yazyki russkoy kul’tury, 1999. – 632 p.


Information about the Author:

Urazayeva Kuralay B.(Astana, Kazakhstan) ‒ Professor of the Department of Russian Philology of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Doctor of Philology, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. Scientific interests: history of Russian and Kazakh literature, literary translation studies, non-rhetoric. Email: SPIN-код: 4096-8621


For citation: Urazayeva Kuralay B. (2024).

The Author’s Position in a Fiction Work as a Manifestation of Identity.

Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science,

Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2024), pp. 18-27 (in USA)

Manuscript received: 15/02/2024

Accepted for publication: 25/03/2024